AI-Native Delivery: When AI Reshapes the Entire Lifecycle

Two approaches to AI in software delivery

Most software companies today discuss AI adoption. However, a closer look at development practices reveals:

1. AI-augmented SDLC maintains the traditional structure, with requirements, design, development, testing, and deployment as the phases that remain intact. Roles remain specialised. Handoffs continue. AI becomes a productivity tool within each activity. The process accelerates, but its shape doesn't change.
2. AI-native SDLC takes a different approach. Rather than focusing on making each step faster, it asks what delivery looks like when AI is a collaborative partner throughout. This requires rethinking phases, roles, relationships, and value creation.

Both approaches use the same tools and are valid in different contexts. Let us focus on the AI-native path.

How AI-native SDLC restructures software delivery

• The atomic unit of work expands: Traditional software development teams break work into epics, stories, and tasks, plan sprints, and estimate effort around these small units. With AI, engineers can deliver much larger projects in the same timeframe. Completing an entire workflow in a single sprint becomes realistic, which makes task-level planning feel unnecessarily granular. The unit of work gets larger as the capability to deliver grows.
• The level of abstraction increases: As AI manages implementation details, human focus shifts from writing functions to solving business problems. Engineers remain committed to quality but engage differently by setting constraints, reviewing outputs, and ensuring alignment with intent.
• Phases blur and merge: In traditional delivery, requirements, design, development, and testing are separate stages that happen in sequence. In AI-native delivery, those boundaries dissolve. Building something often uncovers requirements that weren't visible upfront. Testing no longer waits until development is done, but it happens alongside it. Design doesn't precede development. It takes shape through iteration. The phases don't disappear. They just stop being distinct steps and start happening together.
• Estimation loses its traditional meaning: Story points rely on stable work-to-effort relationships, but AI can dramatically alter productivity. The same feature may take a day or a week, depending on AI usage. Planning becomes adaptive, focusing on outcomes rather than scope.
• The definition of "done" shifts: It transforms from "code complete, tests pass, PR approved" to "problem solved, validated against intent, creating value." Teams optimise for outcomes, not artefacts.
• The client relationship changes: Clients present problems and desired outcomes, while the team is responsible for finding solutions. The assurance of "we built what you asked for" is replaced by "we solved your problem." Clients validate working software, not documents, shifting the relationship to a partnership.
• The role evolves: These shifts demand someone who thinks in flows rather than tasks and moves fluidly across dissolved-phase boundaries. We call this the Solution Creator – not a job title, but a way of engaging with work. Where traditional engineers ask, "What should I build?", Solution Creators ask, "What problem am I solving?"

The shift is subtle but fundamental. Most people approach AI from a position of authority, treating it as something to instruct. But the more effective approach recognises that AI often knows more than the person directing it.

The real skill is steering, knowing where to go, not just how to give orders. Solution Creators work alongside AI as partners, bringing judgment, context, and accountability to the table. AI contributes capability, speed, and precision.

Neither leads blindly, but both contribute.

Blog post

Discover the hidden challenges of AI-native delivery

Read more

Gain tailored QA and testing

Explore tailored software solutions

3 modes of AI-native delivery: Intent, Build, Operate

Mode 1: Intent

This is where problems get defined through conversation and demonstration, not lengthy documentation.

Intent takes shape through rapid prototyping. Rather than describing what will be built, teams demonstrate it. Working software emerges in hours, not weeks of specification writing. Stakeholders respond to something real, not a concept. The driving question throughout is whether the right problem is being solved, and the answer comes through demonstration, not discussion.

This mode requires discipline. AI naturally pushes toward building before fully understanding the problem — it wants to write code immediately. The skill is resisting that pull: understanding the core problem first, before any implementation begins.

Validation: Every prototype tests an assumption about what the problem actually is. Intent is captured when stakeholders say the solution reflects exactly what they need or when the prototype exposes that the real problem was something else entirely.

Mode 2: Build

This is where solutions take shape, iteratively and rapidly, with AI as a collaborative partner.

Building and discovery happen together. The act of building surfaces requirements that Intent mode couldn't fully anticipate. Design doesn't come before development; it emerges through iteration. Teams try something, learn from it, and adjust. AI handles the mechanical side of implementation while humans focus on what matters most: how pieces fit together, whether the solution holds coherence, and whether it stays aligned with the original purpose.

Validation: Every increment is tested against the original intent. The goal isn't just working code, but a solution that actually solves the problem. Catching mistakes early makes them easy to fix.

Mode 3: Operate

This is where solutions live, but thinking about it starts from day one. Questions about monitoring, maintenance, and evolution don't wait until deployment. They shape how the solution gets built in the first place. Once live, real usage tells the team what works, what doesn't, and what needs to change next. Operating isn't the finish line. It's the feedback that drives the next cycle.

Validation: User behaviour shows whether the solution actually solves the problem in the real world, not just in theory.

Validation across all three modes

Validation isn't a phase or a checkpoint. It runs continuously through all three modes. In Intent mode, the team confirms it understands the problem. In Build mode, it checks whether the solution is heading in the right direction. In Operate mode, it determines whether the problem was actually solved.

This changes how teams relate to uncertainty. Rather than trying to eliminate it through detailed upfront planning, they resolve it through rapid learning. When understanding can be tested in hours, perfect requirements become unnecessary.

Conclusion

AI-native SDLC reimagines delivery with AI as a collaborative partner throughout. New modes of work: Intent, Build, Operate. New roles are fluid and outcome-focused. New client relationships, partnership over specification. New accountability problems solved, not tasks completed.

The same tools enable both approaches. The difference isn't technology, it's the approach.

Same tools, different game.