ASML, the Dutch chip-making giant, is investing €1.3 billion in the French AI company Mistral. The deal gives Europe’s leading AI startup a big boost and ensures it stays under European control. This move comes as U.S. companies like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft dominate the global AI race, leaving Europe struggling to catch up.
We spoke with Taras Firman, Data Science Competency Manager at ELEKS, to highlight the strategic importance of European artificial intelligence development.
How should we understand this ASML-Mistral investment? What's really driving this major deal?
I think we can frame this in a way that highlights the broader political and strategic aspects. After all, this shift isn’t driven only by technical capacity—it has emerged against the backdrop of recent political developments, including the growing concern in Europe about overdependence on the United States.
That said, competition itself is always a positive force. It drives quality and innovation, as we’ve seen in industries like automotive manufacturing, where multiple players compete, experiment, and set new trends. The same applies to AI. More competition means more innovation, more approaches, and ultimately stronger solutions.
Why is Europe's AI innovation important?
From my perspective, there are three main aspects that answer this question:
1. Competition as a driver of innovation
Healthy competition ensures that no single region dominates the development of frontier technologies. Just as in the automotive market, multiple players stimulate innovation and raise standards. The entrance of strong European players into AI strengthens the global ecosystem and reduces the risk of overconcentration in the U.S.
2. Localisation and linguistic diversity
Most current models are primarily trained on English-language data. As a result, they tend to perform significantly better in English than in other languages—Ukrainian, for example, lags far behind. Europe, however, is inherently multilingual, with major world languages such as French and German, alongside dozens of smaller ones. Stronger European AI companies can help localise models more effectively for these diverse markets, ensuring better cultural and linguistic fit.
3. Data sovereignty and infrastructure independence
There’s also the question of where data and models are hosted. It is always better when data and models are co-located rather than dispersed across different jurisdictions. Political realities make it clear that Europe needs greater independence in AI infrastructure, hosting powerful models within the EU itself rather than relying solely on U.S.-based providers. This is crucial not just for performance, but for strategic and political resilience.
What does this mean in practice?
In short, the growth of AI development within the EU benefits everyone. Competition raises quality, localisation brings AI closer to diverse European users, and sovereignty ensures security and independence. Together, these three aspects create a stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive AI ecosystem.
Related insights
