Key takeaways
- Agents need machine-verifiable feedback, not just readable code.
- A short AGENTS.md covers the intent, ownership and constraints that the code can't show.
- Small commits, scoped permissions and human-gated deployments keep AI output safe.
- Human review moves from syntax to architecture.
- Monorepos give agents the end-to-end view they need.
Why traditional codebases fail AI agents
AI (artificial intelligence) in software engineering has long moved well beyond inline completions. Teams will now hand real tasks to agents (Claude Code, Augment Code, GitHub Copilot etc) to draft features, refactor services and track down bugs. The problem they then encounter is that most codebases are very difficult for autonomous tools to navigate.
For decades, repositories were built around human habits: implicit architectural choices, shared knowledge and tribal memory. An agent can't walk over to a colleague and ask whether a legacy service is still active. Dropped into a codebase full of hidden assumptions, it will guess, waste context tokens, and copy bad existing patterns, adding to technical debt.
The edge today isn't which model you subscribe to. It's how clearly your codebase presents itself to a machine.
What makes a codebase agent-ready: verification, boundaries and architecture
It's about moving from 'human readable' to 'machine verifiable' and deciding right at the outset what an agent is permitted to touch (which repos, which branches, which environments).
Agents work in a tight loop: explore, plan, code, verify. If you skip verification or rely on unreliable verification, the agent will assume silence means success and ship broken logic. Passing tests don't mean the code is safe or that it meets your standards in any way so agents need three things:
- Clear boundaries. Strict static typing and aggressive linting keep it firmly rooted in reality.
- Fast, loud feedback. Your CI/CD pipeline should run the tests, the linting, the type checks, the security scans and fail in a very visible way so that the agent can then go and fix the issues itself.
- Strong tests. Unit tests cover the isolated behaviour and end-to-end tests protect the key user journeys.
Architecture matters as well. In a .NET 10 backend, you'd use vertical slice architecture (using something like FastEndpoints). As a result, each API route is self-contained, and an agent can understand a feature without loading half the codebase. Add in OpenTelemetry tracing, and you get very clear signals as the code runs. The clean boundaries between your domain logic and your infrastructure act as a map and are a massive help to new developers.
AGENTS.md: giving agents the context your code can’t
AGENTS.md is the README for machines. It matters because stuffing a giant system prompt into a repository clutters the context window, lowers output quality and raises token costs.
Keep the file short and use it only for what the code can't reveal. Leave formatting and style to deterministic tools like .editorconfig. A good AGENTS.md answers:
- What is the business goal of this area?
- Who owns it, and what can the agent change?
- Which external APIs are off-limits?
- How do I start local dependencies for integration runs?
- Which environment variables and feature flags affect behaviour?
Use progressive disclosure: keep the top-level file brief and link to deeper documentation for specific frameworks, architectural decisions and individual services. Because the file lives in the repository, it is versioned with the code and gives every AI tool the same entry point.
How do you keep AI-generated code safe?
An agent can touch dozens of files in one pass. Three rules keep that manageable:
- Require atomic commits. Ask agents for small, single-purpose changes, with the implementation, tests and documentation updates in the same PR. When a regression appears, git bisect finds the cause without wading through hundreds of unrelated lines.
- Scope permissions. Limit agents to specific branches and define what they may create or modify.
- Gate production. Agents are good at writing Bicep or Terraform alongside application code, but release execution should require explicit human approval. That protects live environments from unverified changes and leaked secrets.
Also remember that models can suggest deprecated APIs or outdated patterns, which is another reason to rely on automated checks.
Related Insights
The breadth of knowledge and understanding that ELEKS has within its walls allows us to leverage that expertise to make superior deliverables for our customers. When you work with ELEKS, you are working with the top 1% of the aptitude and engineering excellence of the whole country.
Right from the start, we really liked ELEKS’ commitment and engagement. They came to us with their best people to try to understand our context, our business idea, and developed the first prototype with us. They were very professional and very customer oriented. I think, without ELEKS it probably would not have been possible to have such a successful product in such a short period of time.
ELEKS has been involved in the development of a number of our consumer-facing websites and mobile applications that allow our customers to easily track their shipments, get the information they need as well as stay in touch with us. We’ve appreciated the level of ELEKS’ expertise, responsiveness and attention to details.
